[robocup-humanoid] robocup-humanoid Digest, Vol 49, Issue 2
Guillermo Villarreal
memogrr18 at hotmail.com
Sun Nov 7 16:19:55 EST 2010
Hi all.
I think that the orange tennis ball for kidsize is ok.
About the white ball i think it will be very hard to identify for many teams. I know that the league has to evolve but i think that would be too much for now.
About the robot's color: we use some aluminium parts, but the biggest ones are made from carbon fiber. Motors are also black, so painting them to aluminium seems useles to me. Furthermore, i think that aluminium looks better black painted. . So i suggest to leave open the option of using black or aluminim color for every team.
About the poles i would like to keep them. But if the league has to evolve i think that's the next step.
Best regards
Guillemro VillarrealTeam Bogobots.
> From: robocup-humanoid-request at cc.gatech.edu
> Subject: robocup-humanoid Digest, Vol 49, Issue 1
> To: robocup-humanoid at cc.gatech.edu
> Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 12:00:02 -0400
>
> Send robocup-humanoid mailing list submissions to
> robocup-humanoid at cc.gatech.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.cc.gatech.edu/mailman/listinfo/robocup-humanoid
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> robocup-humanoid-request at cc.gatech.edu
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> robocup-humanoid-owner at cc.gatech.edu
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of robocup-humanoid digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Rule Discussion for 2011 (Oskar von Stryk)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:53:25 +0100 (CET)
> From: Oskar von Stryk <stryk at sim.tu-darmstadt.de>
> Subject: [robocup-humanoid] Rule Discussion for 2011
> To: Humanoid League Mailing List <robocup-humanoid at cc.gatech.edu>
> Message-ID:
> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1011051043440.9935 at mail.sim.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>
>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
>
> Dear HL Teams,
>
> To continue the discussion of the evolution of the rules
> which we had in the team leader meeting on June 23, 2010, in Singapore
> I am posting a summary from my notes.
>
> Please send your comments and additions to this mailing list.
>
> We should aim at finalizing the rule discussion for RoboCup 2011 in
> Istanbul, by the end of 2010.
>
> Best regards,
> Oskar
>
> Notes from team leader meeting on 2010/6/23:
> -------------------------------------------
> Layout of the field:
>
> - Increase Teen/AdultSize Field
> + approx. 1.5 times / area doubling
> + 7:0:1 pro:con:abstains (only Teen/AdultSize teams)
>
> - Removing poles
> + 2:14:2 majority against
>
> - Aim for KidSize 5vs5 demo games on enlarged Teen/AdultSize Field.
>
> - GC: increase penalty for manually started teams to 20 s
> + 4:12:3 majority against
>
> - specify the maximum mesh size of the net
>
> - Other ball for Teen/AdultSize
> + FIFA size 3 and 5 orange balls
> teams need to check
>
> - Other ball for KidSize?
> + other orange ball:
> --> check with SPL about availability of their ball
> + white ball ?
>
> - Number of players in TeenSize
> + increase to three: 1:5:6 (majority against)
>
> Design of the robots
> + minimum height TeenSize: everyone who thinks
> of attending TeenSize votes:
> 80cm: 3
> 90cm: 0
> 100cm: 6
> abstains: 5
> no majority for decreasing minimum hight TeenSize
>
> + foot size reduce from H^2/28 to H^2/30
>
> + robot body color:
> aluminium frame
>
> longterm goal: colored robot, brighter
>
> teams for brighter color, white
> 8:5:1
> but may have to color feet black
>
> 4.6.1 also you may not use team colors of the other team
>
> + size: later perhaps KidSize, TeenSize, Adultsize
> heights could be increased all together
>
> Technical challenge
> + TeenSize: double pass instead of footrace
> 5:0:0
>
> + Replacing one challenge by kicking high challenge
> 7:3:3
>
> + Remove throw-in for kicking high: 3
> + remov passing for kick high: 4
> + remove dribble: 2
> + abstains: 4
>
>
> + arbitrary ball challenge
> pro: 7:1:6
> everyone brings own ball, but gets own ball not
>
> robot starts on center mark, ball selected by referee,
> first touch it
>
> balls should be introduced first?
>
> --> Check with SPL how they did it earlier?
>
> + There are some concerns that more than 3 challenges
> may cause lots of difficulties
> (preparation of teams more time consuming,
> more time for referee training needed, etc.).
>
>
> Rules of the game
> + 10 goal difference mercy rule,
> teams that score more than 10 goals, e.g. 11:1,
> are counted only 10 goals for the round robin ranking
> (the other team of course gets their goals counted)
>
> For counting less received goals
> 5:0:9
> p. 40
>
> - Number of trophies for Teen & AdultSize,
> depending on no. of teams
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> robocup-humanoid mailing list
> robocup-humanoid at cc.gatech.edu
> https://lists.cc.gatech.edu/mailman/listinfo/robocup-humanoid
>
>
> End of robocup-humanoid Digest, Vol 49, Issue 1
> ***********************************************
More information about the robocup-humanoid
mailing list